Categories
casitas for sale in san carlos mexico

[28] A local business owner expressed support of non-violent demonstrations and told The Cavalier Daily that "The only way thing[s] change is if you talk about what's happening. Jun 8, 2013 Jackie Coakley and Howard E. Andrews were married April 13 in Phillips Chapel Church at Jimtown with the Rev. appears willing to take her to task, either in a civil suit (Rolling Stone might want to think about that) or in a criminal case, given that she perpetrated a massive fraud with some pretty serious consequences and material damages. NPR's Scott Simon talks to Lydia Teasley of the Negro Leagues Family Alliance about honoring baseball's past and her father Ron "Schoolboy" Teasley about his own history in the Negro Leagues. [27] A student quoted in The Daily Progress said that men at a nearby bar were "quick to yell 'insults and slurs' at the protesters as they walked by". "[113] Assistant editor Elisabeth Garber-Paul provided fact-checking. [95], On December 10, 2014, The Washington Post published an updated account of its inquiry into the Rolling Stone article. Rolling Stone ran the story anyway, to their journalistic and financial detriment. They went on to call for Rolling Stone to "fully and unconditionally retract its story and immediately remove the story from its website". However, that statement seemed to contradict an earlier assertion the accuser had made to The Washington Post, in which she stated: "I know it was Phi [Kappa] Psi, because a year afterward, my friend pointed out the building to me. "[56] But on December 5, 2014, Rolling Stone published an online apology, stating that there appeared to be "discrepancies" in the accounts of Erdely's sources and that their trust in the accuser was misplaced. Had they done so, of course, they might have realized that some of the names in the account didn't exist, and that there was no party at all at the Phi Psi house on the night Miss Coakley claimed to have been assaulted at, she claimed, a party.Rolling Stone ran the story anyway, to their journalistic and financial detriment. To the far left, behind a glass wall and through a glass door, is the children's play place. [8][9], On January 12, 2015, Charlottesville Police officials told UVA that an investigation had failed to find any evidence confirming the events in the Rolling Stone article. They were the result of a wanton journalist who was more concerned with writing an article that fulfilled her preconceived narrative about the victimization of women on American college campuses, and a malicious publisher who was more concerned about selling magazines to boost the economic bottom line for its faltering magazine, than they were about discovering the truth or actual facts. [48], Per records released by Yahoo under subpoena in 2016, Haven Monahan's e-mail account was created from inside the University of Virginia "only one day before that same account sent an email to Jackie's friend Ryan Duffin" in 2012. The media commentators noted that the claims of a rape culture's existence on campuses was not supported by U.S. government statistics or other measures. Sponsorship and interview inquiries cheerfully welcomed at bsutton@alum.mit.edu. The published story glossed over the gaps in the magazine's reporting by using pseudonyms and by failing to state where important information had come from. [139], National sorority leaders ordered UVA sororities to not interact with fraternities during Boys Bid Night when fraternities admit new pledges. Later media analysis of photos Jackie showed her friends of her date demonstrated that they were pictures taken from the public social media profile of a former high-school classmate of Jackie, who was not a student of the University of Virginia, did not live in the Charlottesville area, and was out of state at an athletic competition the day of the alleged attack. [60][117], The Columbia report also found a failure in journalistic standards by either not making contact with the people they were publishing derogatory information about, or when they did, by not providing enough context for people to be able to offer a meaningful response. [161] On November 4, 2016, after 20 hours of deliberation,[162] a jury consisting of eight women and two men found Rolling Stone, the magazine's publisher and Erdely liable for defaming Eramo. After the Charlottesville Police made their official report, Wemple said: "What is left of the Rolling Stone piece? [26] A few hours after the incident, several news groups received an anonymous letter claiming responsibility for the vandalism and demanding that the university implement harsher consequences for sexual assault (mandatory expulsion), conduct a review of all fraternities on campus, the resignation of Nicole Eramo, and the implementation of harm reduction policies at fraternity parties. ", "Why Did Rolling Stone Writer Choose UVA, Not Vanderbilt, for Gang Rape Expos? In today's 24-hour news cycle, we all have a tendency to rush to judgment without having all of the facts in front of us. [18] [13][14] The UVA student, identified only as "Jackie" by the magazine, had been taken to a party by a fellow student, hosted at UVA's Phi Kappa Psi fraternity during 2012. Forward it to your friends! "[85][86] Robby Soave in Reason's Hit & Run Blog answered Bradley's query about why Erdely chose UVA over Vanderbilt. "[132], According to the Columbia report, "Allen W. Groves, the University dean of students, and Nicole Eramo, an assistant dean of students, separately wrote to the authors of this report that the story's account of their actions was inaccurate." to see all of them, at. There is certainly a good argument to make that it is often necessary to prosecute as a deterrent to the next person willing to try the same felonious act. It was later revealed Erdely had not interviewed any of the men accused of the rape. [16] The university would not take further action unless Jackie disclosed the names of the individuals or the fraternity involved. In May 2013, Jackie reported the sexual assault to dean and head of UVA's Sexual Misconduct Board, Nicole Eramo, who, according to a recap in New York magazine, offered three options: "file a criminal complaint with the police, file a complaint with the school, or face her attackers with Eramo present to tell them how she feels". As a result, our fraternity was vandalized, our members ostracized based on false information. [12] In light of the findings, Erik Wemple of The Washington Post pronounced the story "a complete crock". Attorneys for the dean, Nicole Eramo, allege that NOW, the largest feminist group in the U.S., and the lawyers for the false rape accuser, Jackie Coakley ("Jackie"), engaged in a "publicity stunt" by jointly crafting a Jan. 6, 2016 open letter criticizing Eramo for "re-victimiz[ing]" the fabulist. It was prepared by Steve Coll, the dean of Columbia's journalism school; Sheila Coronel, the dean of academic affairs; and Derek Kravitz, a graduate school researcher. "[116] [49][50] After initially refusing to answer whether Jackie had access to or created the Haven Monahan email account, on May 31, 2016, Jackie's law firm filed court papers acknowledging they had recently accessed "Haven Monahan's" e-mail account for the purpose "of confirming that documents Eramo requested for the lawsuit were no longer in Jackie's possession. All of this, we might point out, happened only because a petulant, amoral female student wanted attention, and because the climate against sexual assault has risen to where the assumption is of guilt rather than innocence. "[77] Merlan had also labeled journalist Richard Bradley's doubts about the article a "giant ball of shit". [146], Media sources and commentators discussed the allegations in the context of the reported "rape culture" or a rampant sexual assault epidemic that activists had claimed existed on U.S. college campuses. The story was heart-breaking, but ultimately appears to be proved untrue. [142] Froma Harrop issued a call for media outlets to begin to publicly name rape accusers, explaining that "reporters and editors should expand their sensitivities to include the reputations of those accused, not always justly". Jackie's penchant for crying wolf is also evident. "[52] According to news articles covering lawsuits resulting from the Rolling Stone article, Jackie concocted the Haven Monahan persona in a catfishing scheme directed at Duffin, who had not responded to romantic overtures that Jackie had directed at him. On November 19, 2014, Rolling Stone published the now retracted article by Sabrina Erdely titled "A Rape on Campus" about an alleged gang rape of a University of Virginia (UVA) student, Jackie Coakley. "Under the scenario cited by Erdely", Wemple wrote, "the Phi Kappa Psi members are not just criminal sexual-assault offenders, they're criminal sexual-assault conspiracists, planners, long-range schemers. "[82], Writing for Time, columnist Cathy Young said that the unraveling of Erdely's article "exposed the troubling zealotry of advocates for whom believing rape claims is somewhat akin to a matter of religious faith". And in this case, our judgement was wrong. When Camille Cosby spoke about the rape allegations against her husband Bill, she said: "We all followed the story of the article in the Rolling Stone concerning allegations of rape at the University of Virginia. The accuser told the Post that she had felt "manipulated" by Erdely, and claimed she asked Erdely not to quote her in the article, a request the journalist denied. "[144] Writing for Bloomberg, Zara Kessler observed that, "suddenly, every Cosby accuser is a potential 'Jackie'although we don't yet know precisely what it means to be a 'Jackie.' [16] "Drew" gives "instruction and encouragement" to the seven rapists. [25], UVA's student newspaper The Cavalier Daily described mixed reactions from the student body, stating: "For some, the piece is an unfounded attack on our school; for others, it is a recognition of a harsh reality; and for what I suspect is a large majority of us, it falls somewhere in between. So where is good old Jackie Coakley these days? ", "Rolling Stone publisher: U.Va. The UVA student, identified only as "Jackie" by the magazine, had been taken to a party by a fellow student, hosted at UVA's Phi Kappa Psi fraternity during 2012. "[118] It points out that Rolling Stone staff were initially unwilling to recognize these deficiencies and denied a need for policy changes. [28] Community members offered suggestions for immediate steps administration could take to implement preventive measures and address safety concerns regarding sexual assault. "[121], Rolling Stone announced that Will Dana would leave his job at the magazine, effective August 7, 2015. Disgraced former Rolling Stone reporter Sabrina Erdely admitted in the company's defamation trial that she failed to speak to critical figures in her story about a gang rape at the University of Virginia (UVA), who could have exposed key source Jackie Coakley as a fantastic liar, according to reports. "[69][70] Around the same time, WCAV of Charlottesville, Virginia, published the audio of Jackie's 2014 statements to Erdely. The march ended outside of the Phi Kappa Psi house where protesters challenged a perceived "culture of sexual assault at the University". "[17] At the end of the day, UVA's incredible story fit Erdely's narrative better than Vanderbilt's credible one. . "[136][137][138], The Rolling Stone article had a negative effect on applications to the University of Virginia. [38], Bruce Shapiro of Columbia University said that an engaged and empathetic reporter will be concerned about inflicting new trauma on the victim: "I do think that when the emotional valence of a story is this high, you really have to verify it." [164] The lawsuit was settled on April 11, 2017. ", Also within the first day following publication, Phi Kappa Psi's fraternity house at UVA was vandalized with spray-painted graffiti that read "suspend us", "UVA Center for Rape Studies", and "Stop raping people". So it took me a day or two to admit that I found many of Erdely's details unrecognizable. [32][33] Erdely defended her decision not to interview the accused by saying that the contact page on the fraternity's website "was pretty outdated". In fact, her failure to speak to the three friends in whom Jackie supposedly confided immediately after the alleged incident was perhaps the most egregious of a string of journalistic failures. We must, apparently, not give out the names of accusers even after they have been shown to be liars. [47], In Erdely's story, Jackie sank into depression after the alleged rape and was holed up in her dorm room for a while. Obviously, they're older now and we are doing an . Lindy West said that female rape victims will probably be less likely to report sexual assaults for fear of being questioned by "some teenage 4Channer". Circuit Court filed November 9, 2015), Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism, North American Interfraternity Conference, Fraternity and Sorority Political Action Committee, "Rolling Stone and UVA: The Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism Report", "Rolling Stone Faces Millions More In Defamation Charges", "Fake News: Postmodernism By Another Name", "Dan Liljenquist: News stories about fake news stories", "Rolling Stone, Sabrina Rubin Erdely deemed liable in dean's defamation suit for University of Virginia rape story", "Lawyers in Rolling Stone lawsuit file new evidence that 'Jackie' created fake persona", "How the Retracted Rolling Stone Article 'A Rape on Campus' Came to Print", "Rolling Stone's investigation: 'A failure that was avoidable', "UVA dean awarded $3M in Rolling Stone magazine case", "Rolling Stone Settles Last Remaining Lawsuit Over UVA Rape Story", "The Misguided Idea Of The War Over Campus Sexual Assault", "A Rape on Campus: A Brutal Assault and Struggle for Justice at UVA", "Everything We Know About the UVA Rape Case [Updated]", "Key elements of Rolling Stone's U-Va gang rape allegations in doubt", "Sabrina Rubin Erdely, woman behind Rolling Stone's explosive U-Va alleged rape story", "UVA's Sullivan reflects on tenure, Rolling Stone controversy, student privacy laws", "Rolling Stone never asked U-Va. about specific gang rape allegations, according to newly released e-mails and audio recording", "Students claiming responsibility for Phi Kappa Psi vandalism submit anonymous letter", "U-Va president suspends fraternities until Jan. 9 in wake of rape allegations", "Protest outside Phi Kappa Psi house leads to four arrests", "Hundreds protest at UVA; student says memorial to victims vandalized", "The Governing Board of the Inter-Fraternity Council at UVA", "Author of Rolling Stone article on alleged U-Va. rape didn't contact accused assailants for her report", "Rolling Stone whiffs in reporting on alleged rape", "McAuliffe urges investigation at U-Va. after, "Official Statement from the Virginia Alpha Chapter of Phi Kappa Psi Fraternity at the University of Virginia", "Magazine's Account of Gang Rape on Virginia Campus Comes Under Scrutiny", "Rolling Stone Tries to Regroup After Campus Rape Article is Disputed", "Updated apology digs bigger hole for Rolling Stone", "U-Va. remains resolved to address sexual violence as, "There's More Bizarre Evidence That UVA Student Jackie's Alleged Rapist Doesn't Exist", "Friends' accounts differ from victim in UVA rape story CNN.com", "More problems with the Rolling Stone piece", "U-Va. students challenge Rolling Stone account of alleged sexual assault", "U.Va. "[27] "A Rape on Campus" is a retracted, defamatory Rolling Stone magazine article[2][3][4] written by Sabrina Erdely and originally published on November 19, 2014, that describes a purported group sexual assault at the University of Virginia (UVA) in Charlottesville, Virginia. The Charlottesville Police Department investigation confirms that far from being callous, our staff members are diligent and devoted in supporting and caring for students. Complaint, Virginia Alpha Chapter of Phi Kappa Psi Fraternity v. Rolling Stone LLC, No. On November 19, 2014, Rolling Stone published the now retracted article by Sabrina Erdely titled "A Rape on Campus" about an alleged gang rape of a University of Virginia (UVA) student, Jackie Coakley. That's terrible for journalism", "Should there have been firings at Rolling Stone? Emails filed in federal court on Friday show that the Rolling Stone reporter who wrote a now-debunked article about a gang rape at the University of Virginia told colleagues that "our worst nightmare" became a reality after she realized the main source for the story was lying. accuser an 'expert fabulist storyteller', "Rolling Stone Can't Even Apologize Right", "Will Dana, Rolling Stone's Managing Editor, to Depart", "Editor who oversaw Rolling Stone's rape story departs magazine, four months too late", "Rolling Stone Appoints a New Managing Editor", "UVA's Phi Psi Responds to Cleared Rape Allegations", "UVA Fraternity Considers Legal Action Over Rolling Stone Article", "UVA Fraternity Exploring Legal Options to Address 'Extensive Damage Caused by Rolling Stone', "Police unable to verify 'Rolling Stone' rape story", "President Teresa A. Sullivan Statement Regarding Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism Report", "U-Va. Phi Psi members speak about impact of discredited gang rape allegations", "Rolling Stone apologises for Virginia rape story", "U-Va. board leader denounces 'drive-by journalism' of Rolling Stone's rape article", "Dean Coll and Dean Coronel Ltr from AW Groves March 6, 2015-2.pdf", "Here Are Some Big Things The Rolling Stone Story About Rape At UVA Got Right", "Prepared Remarks for Presidential Address on the University", "U.Va. ", to become a weapon of revenge. Haven claims that Jackie is ill and frequently hospitalized. Watch Full Episode |", "The Lies of UVA's Jackie: Read All the Catfishing Texts She Sent Her Crush", "The Pulse: Red flags on piece were there", "Phi Kappa Psi Reinstated at the University of Virginia", "Police Investigation Clears UVA Phi Psi Fraternity", UVA rape investigation: Police say no evidence to support allegations reported by Rolling Stone, "Police Find No Evidence of Rape at UVA Fraternity", "Police: No Evidence of Gang-Rape at University of Virginia", "Rolling Stone farms out review of U-Va. rape story to Columbia Journalism School", "Rolling Stone retracts story on alleged UVA rape", "Rolling Stone's investigation: 'A failure that was avoidable' - Columbia Journalism Review", "Rolling Stone Fact-Checker Didn't Ask About Alleged Rape Victim in Emails With UVA Officials", "U-Va.-Rolling Stone e-mails highlight university's attempt to correct magazine", "Columbia Journalism School report blasts Rolling Stone", "Rolling Stone and UVA: The Columbia School of Journalism Report", "Rolling Stone isn't firing anyone. A former student who graduated in 2013 said "the day [the article] came out was the most emotionally grueling of my life. and that there was no party at all at the Phi Psi house on the night Miss Coakley claimed to have been assaulted at, she claimed, a party. The student at the heart of Rolling Stone 's discredited gang-rape story has been ordered by a federal judge to turn over her communications. There's a Chick-fil-A by our office. [157], On May 12, 2015, UVA associate dean Nicole Eramo, chief administrator for handling sexual assault issues at the school, filed a $7.5 million defamation lawsuit in Charlottesville Circuit Court against Rolling Stone and Erdely, claiming damage to her reputation and emotional distress. In response to those revelations, Jackie's father declared that Phi Kappa Psi had been misidentified and the attack had occurred at a different fraternity, though he did not elaborate as to which one. [117], Rolling Stone fully retracted "A Rape on Campus" and removed the article from its website. The original story was told by a young woman named Jackie Coakley identified only as "Jackie" in the article who said she was taken on a date by a handsome member of the Phi Kappa Psi. After other journalists investigated the article's claims and found significant discrepancies, Rolling Stone issued multiple apologies for the story. And no one, from a university president on down, or on up, gets the notion that due process for the accused is actually a core principle of our justice system, to be applied before punishment is meted out.So where is good old Jackie Coakley these days?Well, she is married and is now "Jackie McGovern", living her life, la-la-la, scot-free despite being the central figure in a mammoth fraud that has cost people their jobs, institutions their reputations, and a magazine a spitload of money.And nobody nobody appears willing to take her to task, either in a civil suit (Rolling Stone might want to think about that) or in a criminal case, given that she perpetrated a massive fraud with some pretty serious consequences and material damages.Why not?I have no assumption to make, as to whether she has not been sued because she is a shallow pocket, incapable of affording a large settlement in a civil suit. [37], The Washington Post reporters later interviewed the accuser at the center of Erdely's story and two of the friends that Rolling Stone said she had met on the night of the incident. Gary Pleasants, Phi Kappa Psi has been cleared; "We found no basis to believe that an incident occurred at that fraternity, so there's no reason to keep them suspended. [46] When you walk in, the line to order is directly in front of you, with the cash registers just ahead and off to the right. [59], The New York Observer stated that Rolling Stone deputy managing editor Sean Woods (the editor directly responsible for the article)[60] tendered his resignation to the magazine's owner, Jann Wenner. washingtonexaminer.com And I think the level of devastation that this Rolling Stone report that's now looking to go from a misremembered event to perhaps an actual hoax." "[29], Richard Bradley, editor-in-chief of Worth magazine, was among the first mainstream journalists to question the Rolling Stone article, in a blog entry written on November 24, 2014. The magazine set aside or rationalized as unnecessary essential practices of reporting that, if pursued, would likely have led the magazine's editors to reconsider publishing Jackie's narrative so prominently, if at all. Erdely wrote that Randall was no longer friends with Jackie and, "citing his loyalty to his own frat, declined to be interviewed". In her remarks, she said, "Before the Rolling Stone story was discredited, it seemed to resonate with some people simply because it confirmed their darkest suspicions about universitiesthat administrations are corrupt; that today's students are reckless and irresponsible; that fraternities are hot-beds of deviant behavior. The main entrance is in the middle of the building's west side. [42], The article uses the pseudonym "Drew" to refer to a third-year student at the University of Virginia who takes Jackie to the fraternity party where the alleged rape takes place. Sullivan said: "I was plainly not prepared for what the story looked like. [53][54][55], Initially, Erdely stood by her story, stating: "I am convinced that it could not have been done any other way, or any better. [60][117] However, Coco McPherson, who is in charge of Rolling Stone's fact-checking operation, said, "I one-hundred percent do not think that the policies that we have in place failed. Police said that three months after reporting she was raped by two football players in a bathroom at a party, she admitted to the same motivation that drove Jackie. "[158] In February 2016, the judge in the lawsuit ordered Jackie to appear at a deposition on April 5, 2016. Teresa Sullivan, the president of UVa, promptly shut down all the fraternities and, bizarrely, the sororities as well (don't ask), in a "ready, fire, aim" response, without allowing even the Phi Psis the due process to point out all the inaccuracies that made the article suspect.Ultimately, Rolling Stone got sued, paid out a big settlement to get out from under their own stupidity, and took a big black eye as far as journalistic competence. However overall applications were down 0.7 percent to 31,107 in the aftermath of the publication. [159] On March 30, 2016, The Washington Post reported that Jackie's lawyers requested the April deposition be cancelled, to avoid having her "revisit her sexual assault". [71], The Washington Post journalist Erik Wemple criticized the story's graphic details of the alleged crime and said that it was hard to believe due to the "diabolical" description. According to Goldberg, "It is an account of a sober, well-planned gang rape by seven fraternity pledges at the direction of two members. We all remember the tumult at the University of Virginia five years back. There's a new piece (usually three) from Bob every weekday here on Substack. "[108], Over the course of 4 months, the Charlottesville Police spoke to 70 people, including Jackie's friends, Phi Kappa Psi fraternity brothers, and employees at the UVA Aquatic Center, where Jackie worked. . [160] However, on April 2, 2016, the judge denied the motions and ordered Jackie to appear for a deposition on April 6, to be held at a secret location. She was then connected to the good folks at Rolling Stone magazine, which ignored all journalistic standards by publishing the account calling her just "Jackie" to protect her identity, mind you without doing a shred of research to validate any of the facts of the story. . ", "University urged to end Greek groups' suspension", "UVA Issues Statement Regarding Fraternal Suspension", "Police clear U-Va. fraternity, say rape did not happen there", "The Washington Post Inches Closer to Calling the UVA Gang Rape Story a Fabrication", "Report: Rolling Stone rape article 'journalistic failure', "Updated: Jurors Hear From 'Jackie's' Friends in Rolling Stone Trial", "New Questions Raised About Rolling Stone's UVA Rape Story", "What Happened to Jackie? Students at the University of Virginia expressed "bewilderment and anger" following Rolling Stone's apology for its story, with one female student declaring "Rolling Stone threw a bomb at us." The poster featured an image of Lena Dunham, whose own allegations of rape had recently come under scrutiny, and included a sidebar reference to "A Rape on Campus" that read "Our UVA Rape Apology: Ooops, we did it AGAIN!!! Prior to the alleged event, Jackie provided evidence of her relationship with "Drew" to her friends by supplying a phone number for "Drew", with whom Jackie's friends subsequently exchanged messages. The collateral damage included a UVa dean, as well as the entire Greek system there and, well, no one thinks a lot of Teresa Sullivan anymore either. It was Nov. 19, 2014, when the world first learned about Jackie, a young woman who claimed in the pages of Rolling Stone that she had been gang-raped as part of a fraternity initiation. "[150], The Washington Post media critic Erik Wemple stated that everyone connected to this story at Rolling Stone should be fired. "[105], On January 12, 2015, the University of Virginia reinstated the Phi Kappa Psi fraternity after the police investigation concluded that no incident had occurred at the fraternity. Prior to the publication of the story, early-action applications were up 7.5 percent with 16,187 applicants. "[62], Rolling Stone's lawyer told jurors in a 2016 trial that Rolling Stone was victim of a "hoax" and a "fraud", and added with regard to Jackie: "the magazine's editorial staff was no match for Jackie 'she deceived us, and we do know it was purposeful'. Erdely said that Jackie regained consciousness alone in the fraternity after 3 a.m. and fled the building blood-spattered and bruised, phoning three friends for help. It's been over a year since Rolling Stone's big story on an alleged gang rape at the University of Virginia was exposed as a hoax, but the public has long lacked specific details about how UVA student Jackie Coakley concocted her wildly false story. [154] According to Miltenberg, he specializes in "defamation and complex internet and First Amendment issues". [156], Additionally, the Poynter Institute named the story as the "Error of the Year" in journalism. At the chapter house party, Jackie alleged in the article, her date led her to a bedroom where she was gang raped by several fraternity members as part of their initiation ritual. Columbia published Groves' letter, where he contrasts video[133] of his statements to the University of Virginia Board of Visitors in September 2014 with the text of Erdely's published article, which differ significantly,[citation needed] and concludes that Erdely's article contains "bias and malice". Rolling Stone falsely accused some University of Virginia students of heinous, criminal acts, and falsely depicted others as indifferent to the suffering of their classmate. She decided to get the attention she wanted, by making up a completely baseless story about having been gang-raped at a fraternity house, Phi Kappa Psi (colloquially referred to as Phi Psi).She was then connected to the good folks at Rolling Stone magazine, which ignored all journalistic standards by publishing the account calling her just "Jackie" to protect her identity, mind you without doing a shred of research to validate any of the facts of the story. The failure encompassed reporting, editing, editorial supervision and fact-checking. The bride is the daughter of the late Norman and Elsie Miles Armstrong of Pickens and stepmother, the late Nell Bennett Armstrong. ", to become a weapon of revenge.Where, we ask, are the Federal cops? There's a new piece (usually three) from Bob every weekday here on Substack. Haven claims he doesn't know. Sabrina Erdely would also continue to write for Rolling Stone.

Cooperstown Autograph Signings 2021, Metamask Web3 Provider, Michener Chandlee Net Worth, Rug Tufting Workshop Boston, Articles W

where is jackie coakley now

where is jackie coakley now